What is the meaning of "SMART" goals and why a person should set these "SMART" goals. In this blog I am going to answer these two very pivot questions which were discussed in Prof. Mandi's lecture today.
Firstly lets segregate the acronym "SMART":
S – Specific, Simple, Strategic, Sustainable.
M – Measurable,
A – Achievable, Ambitious.
R – Realistic, Rational.
T – Time, Tangible.
Now comes the main question. How to set SMART goals in an organization?
Firstly lets segregate the acronym "SMART":
S – Specific, Simple, Strategic, Sustainable.
M – Measurable,
A – Achievable, Ambitious.
R – Realistic, Rational.
T – Time, Tangible.
Now comes the main question. How to set SMART goals in an organization?
As elementary as it might sound here, the goal setting process is an
elaborate process and something that has baffled managers for quite some
time in an effort to get it right. With the mix of different company
policies and a mix of employees from different strata and backgrounds,
there is no single uniform flowchart that can be followed in an effort
to set the right goals.
Positioning your Goal Set
Legend:
A - Attained/Past Performance
A - Attained/Past Performance
B - Achieved Performance
C - Goal Set
D - Potential
In Infosys where I worked, every employee had
enormous potential to excel and help the organization to prosper. So Goals were set keeping these points in mind. My manager used to set goals for me by analyzing my past performance.
Let me explain by an example. Our performance here is measured in terms of points/rating (in %) secured.
Here is the rating process criteria: (This isn't the exact criteria but through this way it would be easy for you to understand)
Points Achieved - Performance/Rating
Below 100 - Under performer
Exact 100 - Met Target/Expectation
Above 100 - Exceeded expectation
If a person finishes everything on deadline, delivers quality work then only he was given 100 points.
To achieve 120 (above 100) one need to participate in extra assignments that are floated time to time.
My Case:
In my 1st quarter my manager set target of 110 for me. But when my appraisal was done I found I just got 90 that means I used to finish work on time but never beat deadlines.At this point my manager could have set lower or same target of 110 for my next cycle but NO he set target of achieving 120 points. To achieve this he used to mentor me time to time, even I worked on extra assignments that were floated. And Guess what !!! In end my rating points were '110'. That's where the manager comes
into play, he would effectively help you to attain the goal set and thus realize your potential.
Effectively, the ambitious efforts of
my manager had helped me to attain a higher level of performance! Going
ahead, my goals were scaled up time and again, and it bore the same effect.
Observation:
How effectively, the manager has been able to utilize the potential of his employee and through successive iterations, scaled him up to be a better performer and a better contributor towards the success of the organization. I had seen this personally in my work where it made me a better and effective employee over the days.
How effectively, the manager has been able to utilize the potential of his employee and through successive iterations, scaled him up to be a better performer and a better contributor towards the success of the organization. I had seen this personally in my work where it made me a better and effective employee over the days.
No comments:
Post a Comment